The Memory of Power: What Will Zambia’s Former President Edgar Lungu Be Remembered For? The story of a presidency is never written in a single chapter it is etched in roads, whispered in controversies, echoed in laughter, and sometimes sealed in the silence of unresolved endings. In Zambia, the legacy of Edgar Lungu continues to stir debate, long after the applause faded and the ballot boxes were closed. Ask ten Zambians what he will be remembered for, and you may hear ten different answers. Some will point to highways stretching across provinces, symbols of ambition and modernity. Others will lower their voices and speak of corruption allegations that clouded his administration. A few will smile, recalling his off-the-cuff humor that made him relatable in moments of tension. And then there is the unresolved narrative of his political exit and the tensions surrounding his public life after power a kind of “funeral impasse” not of death, but of legacy itself. This is the p...
What Will Edgar Lungu Be Remembered For? Infrastructure, Corruption Allegations, Humor, and a Contested Farewell in Zambia
The Memory of Power: What Will Zambia’s Former President Edgar Lungu Be Remembered For?
The story of a presidency is never written in a single chapter it is etched in roads, whispered in controversies, echoed in laughter, and sometimes sealed in the silence of unresolved endings. In Zambia, the legacy of Edgar Lungu continues to stir debate, long after the applause faded and the ballot boxes were closed.
Ask ten Zambians what he will be remembered for, and you may hear ten different answers. Some will point to highways stretching across provinces, symbols of ambition and modernity. Others will lower their voices and speak of corruption allegations that clouded his administration. A few will smile, recalling his off-the-cuff humor that made him relatable in moments of tension. And then there is the unresolved narrative of his political exit and the tensions surrounding his public life after power a kind of “funeral impasse” not of death, but of legacy itself.
This is the paradox of leadership: greatness and controversy often walk side by side.
A Nation Under Construction: The Infrastructure Legacy
Perhaps the most visible and tangible aspect of Lungu’s presidency lies in concrete, steel, and asphalt. Roads were built, airports expanded, and urban landscapes reshaped. The “Link Zambia 8000” project, among other initiatives, aimed to connect remote regions and stimulate economic growth.
For many citizens, these developments were not abstract policy decisions they were life-changing. A farmer in a previously isolated district could now transport produce to market. A trader could travel faster between towns. Infrastructure became a symbol of progress.
“Development is not just about numbers; it is about people’s lives,” Lungu once said during a commissioning ceremony. “When we build roads, we are building opportunities.”
Indeed, infrastructure projects became a cornerstone of his administration’s narrative. The expansion of Kenneth Kaunda International Airport, upgrades to regional aerodromes, and new urban road networks gave Zambia a more modern face. International observers often acknowledged this drive. According to reports by the World Bank, infrastructure investment in Zambia during this period significantly increased compared to previous administrations.
However, critics argue that the cost of this development was steep. Many of these projects were financed through external borrowing, particularly from China. Zambia’s rising debt levels became a major concern, eventually contributing to the country’s historic default in 2020.
Thus, even in this pillar of achievement, the narrative is layered: development on one hand, financial strain on the other.
Shadows Over Power: Allegations of Corruption
No discussion of Lungu’s legacy can avoid the persistent allegations of corruption that marked his tenure. While no court of law definitively convicted him of wrongdoing, his administration faced widespread criticism over issues of transparency, procurement processes, and governance.
Reports from organizations such as Transparency International consistently raised concerns about Zambia’s declining corruption perception rankings during his presidency. Civil society groups pointed to questionable contracts, inflated project costs, and alleged misuse of public funds.
One particularly contentious issue involved the awarding of large infrastructure contracts without competitive bidding. Critics argued that this created an environment ripe for corruption and patronage.
A Lusaka-based governance analyst once remarked,
“Corruption doesn’t always need a smoking gun it thrives in systems where accountability is weak.”
Supporters of Lungu, however, often countered that corruption is a systemic issue, not unique to his administration. They argued that many accusations were politically motivated, especially in the heated environment leading up to elections.
Lungu himself frequently denied wrongdoing, stating,
“I have always served this country with integrity and within the confines of the law.”
The truth, as is often the case in politics, lies somewhere between perception and proof. But perception, in public memory, can be just as powerful as fact.
The Human Side of Power: Humor and Relatability
Amid the heavy weight of governance, Lungu’s personality offered moments of levity. His humor sometimes spontaneous, sometimes controversial became a defining feature of his public image.
Unlike many leaders who maintain a rigid, formal demeanor, Lungu often appeared relaxed and approachable. His jokes during speeches and public appearances made him relatable to ordinary citizens.
At one rally, he famously quipped about the challenges of leadership, drawing laughter from the crowd and briefly dissolving political tension. Such moments humanized him, presenting a leader who could connect emotionally with his audience.
Political communication experts often emphasize the importance of relatability in leadership. Humor, when used effectively, can bridge the gap between authority and the public.
However, not all his remarks were received positively. Some critics felt that certain jokes were inappropriate given the seriousness of national issues. In these instances, humor became a double-edged sword endearing to some, off-putting to others.
Still, for many Zambians, these lighter moments remain a vivid part of his legacy. They serve as a reminder that even in the highest office, humanity persists.
The “Funeral Impasse”: A Legacy Still in Contention
While Lungu is very much alive, the phrase “funeral impasse” has emerged metaphorically to describe the unresolved nature of his political legacy. It reflects the tensions, divisions, and unanswered questions that linger after his presidency.
His departure from office following the 2021 election marked a significant turning point. The peaceful transfer of power was widely praised, yet the period that followed was anything but quiet.
Legal battles, political rhetoric, and ongoing debates about his role in Zambia’s future have kept him in the national conversation. Questions about whether he should remain active in politics, retire quietly, or face further scrutiny have fueled ongoing discourse.
In many ways, this phase represents a struggle over narrative control. Who gets to define his legacy the supporters who celebrate his achievements, or the critics who highlight his failures?
A political historian from the University of Zambia noted,
“Legacies are not fixed at the end of a presidency. They evolve over time, shaped by memory, politics, and new information.”
This ongoing contestation ensures that Lungu’s story remains unfinished.
Balancing the Scales: Achievement vs. Accountability
Evaluating Lungu’s presidency requires a careful balancing of competing narratives. On one side stands infrastructure development visible, measurable, and impactful. On the other side are allegations of corruption less tangible, but deeply consequential.
This duality is not unique to Zambia. Across the world, leaders are often remembered for both their accomplishments and their controversies. The challenge lies in determining which aspects will endure in collective memory.
Voices from the Ground: Public Perception
Perhaps the most important measure of a leader’s legacy is how they are remembered by the people they served.
In urban areas, some residents praise the improved road networks and modern infrastructure. In rural communities, others recall increased connectivity and access to services.
Yet there are also voices of frustration citizens who felt the economic burden of rising debt and questioned the transparency of government decisions.
A market trader in Lusaka once expressed a common sentiment:
“We saw development, yes. But we also felt the pressure. Life became harder in many ways.”
These diverse perspectives highlight the complexity of public memory. No single narrative can fully capture the experience of an entire nation.
The Weight of History: How Leaders Are Remembered
History has a way of simplifying complex legacies. Over time, details fade, and dominant narratives emerge. For Lungu, the question remains: which narrative will prevail?
Will he be remembered as the president who built roads and modernized infrastructure?
Will the shadow of corruption allegations overshadow these achievements?
Will his humor humanize his image in the long run?
Or will the unresolved tensions of his post-presidency define his place in history?
The answers may not come immediately. As historians revisit his tenure and new generations interpret his impact, his legacy will continue to evolve.
Conclusion:
A Legacy Still Being Written
The story of Edgar Lungu is not one of simple triumph or failure. It is a story of contrasts progress and controversy, connection and division, clarity and ambiguity.
He will be remembered for building roads that changed lives.
He will be remembered for controversies that raised difficult questions.
He will be remembered for moments of laughter that revealed his humanity.
And he will be remembered for a legacy that remains, even now, contested and unresolved.
In the end, perhaps the most honest answer is this: he will be remembered for all of it.
Because history does not choose a single story it preserves them all.
Comments
Post a Comment